|
10 December 2008, TODAY
Fuel oil prices are falling, so why are tariffs still high?
I REFER to the reduction of the electricity tariff by 25 per cent in January. According to the Energy Market Authority's (EMA's) chart on fuel oil price versus the low tension tariff, the tariff was $22.62 in January this year when fuel oil was $96.64.
Since the tariff is pegged to fuel oil, why is the tariff for January next year, at $22.93, higher than that in January this year, when fuel oil is now lower at $92.99 compared to $96.64 in January this year?
This means that year-on-year, despite a 4-per-cent fall in fuel oil, the tariff increased by 1 per cent. So, is the tariff pegged to fuel oil or not? The 25-per-cent decrease is relative to October's 21-per-cent increase.Against the tariff of $23.88 in April, the decrease is only 4 per cent, and is still 1 per cent higher than January's $22.62.
With all the Utilities-Save (U-Save) rebates to help Singaporeans, why has the number of households in arrears increased from 3,600 in 2006 to 5,090 in October, and the number on the Pay As You Use (PAYU) meter scheme also increased from 12,200 in December 2006 to 13,243?
Leong Sze Hian
Reply From EMA
IN "FUEL oil prices are falling, so why are tariffs still high?" (Dec 10), Mr Leong Sze Hian asked why, despite a 4-per-cent fall in the forward fuel oil price from $96.64 per barrel in January 2008 to $92.99 per barrel in January 2009, the electricity tariff over the same period increased by 1 per cent. The electricity tariff comprises both fuel and non-fuel cost components. While the fuel cost has come down due to the decline in fuel oil price, the non-fuel cost, which includes the operating and capital costs of the power plant, has increased due to inflation. This increase in the non-fuel cost more than offsets the decline in the fuel cost, which explains why the overall tariff in January 2009 is slightly higher than that in January 2008.
Mr Leong also highlighted the increase in the number of households in arrears and on the Pay-As-You-Use (PAYU) meter scheme, and questioned the effectiveness of the Utilities Save (U-Save) rebates. In fact, with the recent disbursement of U-Save in November, the number of accounts in arrears has dropped to 3,099, below the level of 4,367 in December 2006. The take-up rate of PAYU meters has also reduced to fewer than 50 new users per month, from 300 to 500 new users each month in 2006.
|
More EMA's replies to letters in the media:
We provide information in a meaningful, timely manner
28 November 2011, TODAY
Liberalisation has its benefits
27 September 2011, TODAY
Changes in electricity tariff primarily driven by fuel cost movements
25 July 2011, TODAY
Factors do help cushion tariffs against oil price hikes
10 March 2011, TODAY
Put the brakes on electricity price hikes
31 December 2009, My Paper
Tariff increase might lead to repercussions
9 October 2009
Choice of electricity retailers
1 October 2009
Tariff-calculation formula online
29 December 2008, My Paper
Power tariff formula reviewed every 2 years
17 December 2008, TODAY
Doing the power math
10 December 2008, TODAY
Gencos don't make 'extraordinary profits'
9 December 2008, The Straits Times
Energy bill formula still being tweaked
13 November 2008, TODAY
Why HK pays a different price
30 October 2008, TODAY
Fairer comparisons - Japan and Ireland
27 October 2008, The Straits Times
Tariff Revision no benefit to power generation companies
20 October 2008, TODAY
Lower distribution cost moderated tariff increase
16 October 2008, Lianhe Zaobao
Why electricity price hike was needed
10 October 2008, The Straits Times
Lower Electricity Tariff if Price of Oil Continues to Fall
7 October 2008, My Paper
Price electricity properly and give focused help
7 October 2008, My Paper
Towards a more liberal electric mart
7 October 2008, My Paper
Quarterly tariff update accounts for time lag
2 October 2008, My Paper
Higher electricity prices will not adversely affect lower-income families
1 October 2008, Lianhe Zaobao
EMA explains spike
1 October 2008, The Straits Times
|