Home
background
   

7 October 2008, My Paper

Govt and EMA should consider struggling middle class too

I WAS shocked at the news that electricity tariffs have been increased by 21 per cent, based on a projected increase in oil prices to US$155 (S$224) per barrel. Experts are predicting prices of only US$100 to US$120 in the long term. Actual prices are also decreasing, and stood at less than US$90 per barrel yesterday.

Inflation is at an all-time high, and public-transport and food prices have just gone up.

How much must the Government add to the burden caused by the rising prices of basic necessities?

As a regulatory authority for the energy market, shouldn't the Energy Market Authority (EMA) safeguard consumer interests and increase electricity tariffs gradually if there is a real need to do so, like what the Public Transport Council has done for public-transport fares?

I am living in my parents' condominium, hence we are not eligible for rebates. We are also the ones who always receive the least benefits and suffer most from increases in the cost of living, even though we do not own the property. A lot of other Singaporeans are facing this plight too.

I hope the EMA will reconsider this sudden surge in electricity prices as it will definitely add to our burden.

With the bad economy and rising costs, why would couples want to have children when they cannot even afford the basic necessities for themseves?

I urge the Government and EMA to empathise with the struggling Singaporean middle class and Singaporeans at large and revise this sudden increase in prices.

The rationale behind this raise is unjustifiable, unnecessary and unwelcome at this juncture.

Alex Chan

Reply From EMA

IN THE letter, "Govt and EMA should consider middle-class too" (my paper, Oct 7 ), Mr Alex Chan expressed concerns over the increase in the electricity tariff and the cost of living.

The tariff is updated every quarter to reflect changes in the forward fuel-oil price in the first month of the previous quarter. The revised tariff is therefore not based on a "projected increase in oil prices", but on actual prices traded in the commodities market.

For example, SP Services used the forward fuel-oil price in April this year of US$83 (S$121) per barrel to set the tariff for July to September, and the price in July of US$115 (S$168) to set the tariff for October to December. This 38-per-cent increase in the oil price between April and July is the reason for the spike in the electricity tariff.

As Mr Chan has noted, the fuel-oil price has started to come down recently. If the oil price continues to stay down, then the tariff would also fall in due course. Mr Chan suggested that the Energy Market Authority (EMA) should have intervened to suppress the tariff increase.

However, all of Singapore's electricity is generated from imported fuel. When the global price of fuel oil goes up sharply, it is untenable for us to keep the electricity price down. Some governments try to subsidise electricity prices, but they find it very hard to sustain such a policy.

Hence, our approach is to price electricity properly, while providing focused and targeted assistance, especially for lower-income groups. In the long term, the best way to keep the electricity price down is to make use of competition to drive efficiency gains in the industry, for the benefit of all consumers.

This is why EMA is taking steps to liberalise the electricity market for the household sector.

When liberalisation is completed, households will be able to purchase electricity from competing providers and price plans.

The Government is mindful of the impact of the higher cost of living on middle-income Singaporeans. They have not been left out of the Government's surplus-sharing and assistance schemes.

For example, in this year's Budget, middle-income Singaporeans received their share of Growth Dividends, personal income-tax rebates, Medisave top-ups and other benefits. These measures will help them offset the increased cost of living.

More EMA's replies to letters in the media:

We provide information in a meaningful, timely manner

28 November 2011, TODAY

Liberalisation has its benefits

27 September 2011, TODAY

Changes in electricity tariff primarily driven by fuel cost movements

25 July 2011, TODAY

Factors do help cushion tariffs against oil price hikes

10 March 2011, TODAY

Put the brakes on electricity price hikes

31 December 2009, My Paper

Tariff increase might lead to repercussions

9 October 2009

Choice of electricity retailers

1 October 2009

Tariff-calculation formula online

29 December 2008, My Paper

Power tariff formula reviewed every 2 years

17 December 2008, TODAY

Doing the power math
10 December 2008, TODAY

Gencos don't make 'extraordinary profits'
9 December 2008, The Straits Times

Energy bill formula still being tweaked
13 November 2008, TODAY

Why HK pays a different price
30 October 2008, TODAY

Fairer comparisons - Japan and Ireland
27 October 2008, The Straits Times

Tariff Revision no benefit to power generation companies
20 October 2008, TODAY

Lower distribution cost moderated tariff increase
16 October 2008, Lianhe Zaobao

Why electricity price hike was needed
10 October 2008, The Straits Times

Lower Electricity Tariff if Price of Oil Continues to Fall
7 October 2008, My Paper

Price electricity properly and give focused help
7 October 2008, My Paper

Towards a more liberal electric mart
7 October 2008, My Paper

Quarterly tariff update accounts for time lag
2 October 2008, My Paper

Higher electricity prices will not adversely affect lower-income families

1 October 2008, Lianhe Zaobao

EMA explains spike
1 October 2008, The Straits Times